Sign in Subscribe
4 min read

Monday Memo

Sell the forbidden...AI filmmaker on hyper-personalized ads...and ‘The Sleeper Effect.’
Monday Memo

A Byte of Knowledge

The maître d' leans in close at Rao's in Manhattan.

"We have a '47 Château d'Yquem in the private cellar," he whispers. "But I only mention it to certain guests."

Suddenly, that $8,000 bottle tastes like validation.

Like you've been chosen.

That's the same psychological trigger that makes "forbidden" financial newsletters outsell their mainstream competitors 3-to-1.

Why does a trading strategy labeled "The Goldman Sachs Secret They Don't Want Retail Investors to Know" convert at 4%...

While the same strategy pitched as "Professional Trading Techniques" barely breaks .5%?

Because your prospect doesn't just want information.

They want to feel like they slipped past the bouncer while everyone else got turned away.

So frame your offer as leaked intelligence.

Stolen playbooks.

The loophole before it closes.

Sell the intoxicating feeling of knowing something the masses don't.

🚀 Whether you're selling a $50 supplements or a $10,000 coaching program – having these 5 'Copy Blocks' on your landing page could be the difference between crickets and an avalanche of cash flow.

Discover All 5 'Copy Blocks' Now

Something to Ponder

We Asked – AI Answered

Our Question: 

"Explain the psychological phenomenon, ‘The Sleeper Effect’, and why marketers need to know about it?"

AI's Answer:

The Sleeper Effect is a well-documented psychological phenomenon where a message from a non-credible source becomes more persuasive over time.

Yes, more persuasive—not less.

It was first observed in World War II propaganda research and later defined formally in the 1940s by Carl Hovland, a Yale psychologist working for the U.S. Army, and his colleagues Irving Janis and Harold Kelley.

The irony? A message that gets dismissed today because of the source… can actually change minds tomorrow—once the audience forgets where it came from.

💡 The foundational 1951 study by Hovland & Weiss:

  • Participants were given a persuasive message on nuclear submarines.
  • The same message was attributed to either:
    • Robert Oppenheimer (credible source—nuclear physicist)
    • Pravda (state-run Soviet propaganda newspaper—non-credible source)

Immediate result:

People believed the Oppenheimer version far more than the Pravda one.

But here’s the kicker: When the same people were asked four weeks later—those who initially read the Pravda version rated it almost as believable as the Oppenheimer one. Over time, the impact of the message persisted, while the distrust of the source faded.

💡 Why It Happens: The Psychology Behind It

  1. When people hear a persuasive message, they form an impression of it.
  2. If the source is untrustworthy, that impression gets suppressed or rejected.
  3. But with time, we forget the source faster than the message itself. (This is called source dissociation.)
  4. Later, when we recall the message without recalling the negative source, it feels more persuasive.

This only works when:

  • The message was initially compelling but dismissed because of the source.
  • The message and source are cognitively disassociated over time.

💡 Why Marketers Must Understand This

If you’re in marketing, branding, sales, or media—this has serious implications for how you think about:

1. “Sketchy” Media Channels

  • Your ad may run in a low-credibility outlet (like a tabloid or low-tier influencer).
  • It might get dismissed at first—but that message can resurface in memory, now unchained from the outlet’s bad rep.
  • Long-term recall wins.

2. Controversial or Disliked Spokespeople

  • Even if a celebrity or influencer is polarizing or disliked, their message can stick and become persuasive later.
  • Think: how people re-use advice from Elon Musk, despite having strong mixed feelings about him.

3. PR Scandals and Misinformation

  • Bad press doesn’t always stay bad.
  • If a damaging message came from a disreputable source, people may start to believe it anyway weeks later.
  • Marketers must track not just sentiment, but source credibility decay over time.

4. Your Cold Traffic Funnel

  • Don’t expect immediate conversions from cold traffic—especially from channels your audience may not fully trust.
  • Focus on planting memorable ideas that will mature over time, when that “source” fades from memory.

💡 Famous Real-World Examples

1. Political Campaigns

  • Negative ads from attack PACs often get dismissed for being “too biased.”
  • But months later, voters remember the claims, not who said them.

2. Supplements and Health Claims

  • People see bold claims from no-name companies and initially scoff.
  • Weeks later, they recall “something about this herb being good for sleep”…and convert.

3. Viral TikTok Product Reviews

  • Viewers might ignore a product because the creator seems like a shill.
  • Later, they remember the benefits described, and the seed has already been planted.

💡 The Flip Side: It Can Work Against You Too

Marketers often assume that discrediting the source of a competitor’s message kills it. Nope. Unless you repeatedly anchor that message to the bad source, it might boomerang back into your customer’s brain, detached from its original context—and work in your competitor’s favor.

💡 Key Takeaways for Marketers

  • Messages outlast their sources.
  • If your ad is memorable, even if the source is weak—it may still persuade later.
  • Use this for long-term planting, not just short-term conversions.
  • Be cautious: messages you want dismissed must stay attached to why they should be dismissed.

Thanks for reading the Monday Memo.

Until next time!

The AI Marketers

P.S. Help shape the future of this newsletter – take a short 2-minute survey so we can deliver even better AI marketing insights, prompts, and tools.

[Take Survey Here]